Quantcast

Actualités

Jeudi 22 octobre 2009 4 22 /10 /Oct /2009 07:32
- Ecrire un commentaire

Source: Daily Nation

Pope Benedict has allowed married Anglican priests to join the priesthood in the Catholic Church.

Pope Benedict said many groups of the Anglican clergy and faithful had asked to enter into full communion with the Catholic Church.

He said this in a statement released on Tuesday by Cardinal William Joseph Levanda, President of the Congregation for the Doctrine of Faith in the Vatican.

Contacted, the Anglican Church of Kenya (ACK) head, Archbishop Eliud Wabukala, declined to comment in detail.

“But I can say there are areas where the Catholics and the Anglicans are very close. The movements between them is not a new phenomenon, it happened during the reformation and continues to take place,” he said.

Making the announcement, Cardinal Levanda said the Catholic Church in a forthcoming document provides for the ordination of married former Anglican clerics as Catholic priests.

But the cardinal said historical and ecumenical reasons precluded the ordination of married men as bishops.

The document that is yet to be released to the public is said to seek to balance between “the concern to preserve the worthy Anglican liturgical and spiritual patrimony and, on the other hand, the concern that these groups and their clergy will be integrated into the Catholic Church”.

The cardinal told the press conference at the Vatican: “The unity of the church does not require a uniformity that ignores cultural diversity…”


The final phase

He said the constitution that is now in the final phase contains proposals to form personal ordinaries (dioceses) with structures similar to those of military ordinariates to take care of former Anglican faithful who have since joined the Catholic Church.

Anglican leaders, Archbishop Vincent Gerald Nichols of Westminster and Dr Rowan William, the archbishop of Canterbury, said the announcement brought to an end uncertainty for groups that had requested to enter full communion with Catholics.

 


Kenya's Anglican Church on Wednesday rejected an offer by Pope Benedict that would have seen married Anglican priests join priesthood in the Catholic Church.

The action by the Anglican clergy potentially puts it in conflict with the Archbishop of Canterbury, Dr Rowan Williams, who had responded to the offer through a letter copied to all provinces worldwide.

“I do not see why it is necessary at this point in history,” ACK Archbishop Eliud Wabukala told the Nation.


Differences

“The Archbishop of Canterbury sent us letters welcoming the offer but for him, it is essentially to deal with the local England context and does not apply to other provinces,” he added.

Archbishop Wabukala said there were major differences on how Catholics and Anglicans, whom he described as more evangelicals, understand the ministry and sacrament, which he said have to be harmonised before any formal reunion.

Any Anglican priest intending to cross over to the Catholic Church must understand these differences beforehand, he said.

“There are theological differences, for instance, the way we understand the ministry and administration of sacrament are quite different,” he added.

Voir les 0 commentaires - Communauté : Afrique des Grands Lacs - Ecrire un commentaire
Par Editions Sources du Nil - Publié dans : Actualités
Jeudi 22 octobre 2009 4 22 /10 /Oct /2009 08:07
- Ecrire un commentaire
Point de presse du 16 octobre 2009, Déclaration du porte-parole du Ministère Français des Affaires Etrangères

6 - REPUBLIQUE DEMOCRATIQUE DU CONGO / RWANDA

(Are you aware that Congo two principles leaders of the FDLR, responsible for massive human rights abuses in Congo live here in Paris? Could you explain why the French government has failed to respond to several requests to investigate this individual case of Calixte Mbarushimana by the UN and the survivors of the genocide?)

Concernant votre première question, oui, nous sommes informés.

S'agissant de votre deuxième question, il faut rappeler un certain nombre de choses avant de rentrer dans le détail juridique de ce dossier.

Je voudrais d'abord rappeler que sur cette tragédie rwandaise, et depuis le début, la France a soutenu très activement la création, en novembre 1994, du Tribunal pénal international pour le Rwanda, créé sur décision du Conseil de sécurité des Nations unies et que nous avons immédiatement transposé dans notre législation nationale. Conformément aux obligations qui découlent de la résolution 955 du Conseil de sécurité, la France a mis sur pied une coopération étroite avec le tribunal. Sans trahir de secret diplomatique, je peux vous préciser que notre ambassadeur en Tanzanie était il y a quelques jours avec le greffier du Tribunal pénal international pour le Rwanda, lequel a remercié la France pour la qualité de sa coopération avec ce tribunal et pour notre engagement à ses côtés pour que la justice puisse être faite sur tous les dossiers qui relèvent du TPIR.

La création de ce tribunal a eu lieu en novembre 1994 et en mai 1996 nous avons adapté la loi française. Par cette adaptation nous reconnaissons la primauté du Tribunal pénal international pour le Rwanda sur les juridictions françaises. Nous avons donc décidé par la loi que le tribunal sur le Rwanda avait plus d'autorité que les tribunaux en France.

Le procureur du tribunal est informé de l'ouverture des poursuites judiciaires en France concernant des crimes relevant de la compétence de ce tribunal sur le Rwanda. Si celui-ci en fait la demande, les juridictions nationales ont la faculté de se dessaisir des dossiers et de les lui passer. Dans ce même esprit de coopération et d'engagement en faveur de la justice et de la vérité, les autorités françaises facilitent la recherche de témoins potentiels résidant en France, organisent à la demande du procureur des auditions en présence d'enquêteurs du Tribunal pénal international pour le Rwanda et remettent à ce tribunal des documents qui peuvent nous être demandés.

Sur l'affaire de Calixte Mbarushimana, je fais un rappel chronologique. Il est le Secrétaire exécutif des forces démocratiques de libération du Rwanda. Il est arrivé en France en 2003, alors que le Tribunal pénal international pour le Rwanda avait arrêté les poursuites à son encontre en septembre 2002. En France il bénéficie d'un statut de réfugié et il faut rappeler qu'en vertu d'une jurisprudence que l'on retrouve dans tous les pays européens et qui a été confirmée par la Cour européenne des droits de l'Homme, la France n'extrade pas de ressortissants de pays qui appliquent la peine de mort, c'était le cas à l'époque, ou dont le système judiciaire ne présente pas de garanties suffisantes.

Sur le plan judiciaire nous savons qu'une procédure a été ouverte contre lui devant la justice française, pour son implication dans le génocide rwandais, par le collectif des parties civiles pour le Rwanda.

S'agissant de la RDC, en mars 2009, à l'initiative de la France et dans le prolongement de la résolution 1804 du 13 mars 2008 du Conseil de sécurité des Nations unies, il a été inscrit sur la liste des sanctions des Nations unies, pour violation de l'embargo sur les armes en RDC et pour obstacle au désarmement des groupes armés. Ces sanctions du Conseil de sécurité qui ont été imposées par la résolution 1804 sont pleinement appliquée en France, c'est-à-dire le gel des avoirs et l'interdiction de voyager.

(The problem is that the MONUC has partly to do with justice in Rwanda but also to do with the conflict in the Democratic Republic of Congo. MONUC officials have consistently said to us that they are extraordinarily disappointed that where they put in great financial expenses and efforts to try to resolve the situation with Eastern Congo, particularly regarding the FDLR, the head of this organisation, the man responsible largely for administrative affairs of the FDLR is still able to operate here in complete impunity and is not being investigated for that. I understand that there is a lot to be dealt with but to a certain extent it is a separated issue in this case.)

Je souhaite rappeler le soutien total de la France aux activités de la MONUC et je rends hommage à ce travail, fait dans des conditions difficiles.

Dans cette affaire, nous avons toujours respecté le droit international : le Tribunal pénal international pour le Rwanda, les résolutions du Conseil de sécurité et la jurisprudence européenne. On peut être déçu, mais il existe des textes qui s'appliquent à tous, et la France est un Etat de droit dans lequel la justice est indépendante et respectée. Elle est respectueuse du droit international. Nous avons donné la primauté du Tribunal pénal international pour le Rwanda sur les juridictions françaises, nous sommes donc allés très loin dans la transposition des résolutions du Conseil de sécurité.

(S'il est réfugié politique, a t-il le droit d'avoir des activités politiques ? Car il envoie des communiqués de presse de son appartement parisien. De plus, le Rwanda n'appliquant plus la peine de mort, quelle preuve avez-vous que le pays n'appliquera pas la justice correctement ?)

En France nous sommes attachés à la liberté de la presse, nous ne pouvons donc pas l'empêcher de vous parler.

Voir les 0 commentaires - Communauté : Afrique des Grands Lacs - Ecrire un commentaire
Par Editions Sources du Nil - Publié dans : Actualités
Lundi 26 octobre 2009 1 26 /10 /Oct /2009 15:16
- Ecrire un commentaire

La cité de Kasugho, 45 kilomètres au sud-ouest de Lubero-centre, était en ébullition dimanche. Des militaires FARDC de la 112e brigade ont revendiqué, au moyen des coups de feu, trois mois d’arriérés de leur solde. Une revendication faite sur fond de pillages, rapporte radiookapi.net


Soldats FARDC revenant du front

Le mouvement a commencé dimanche vers 16h locales. De leurs différentes positions où ils se trouvaient autour de Kasugho, les éléments FARDC se sont mis à tirer en l’air en se dirigeant vers le centre de la cité. Ils scandaient des slogans réclamant leur solde non payée, selon les sources, depuis trois mois. Parmi les soldats mutins, certains se sont livrés au pillage des magasins et des habitations. le bilan humain est d'une personne grièvement blessée. Pris de panique, les habitants de Kasugho sont allés se réfugier dans la brousse, pour les uns, et dans l’enceinte de l’Université de la conservation de la nature et de développement de cette cité, pour les autres.

Les autorités locales confirment ces faits et affirment que les tirs ont été entendus jusqu à lundi matin. En revanche, le comandant second du secteur de Kanyabayonga-Irengeti, le colonel Bawili, ne confirme pas l’information. Il reconnaît tout au plus l’existence, dans ce secteur, des problèmes liés à la situation militaire,sans préciser lesquels.

La situation était cependant redevenue calme ce lundi matin, et la population qui avait fui commençait à regagner la cité, d’après les sources. Les écoles et les marchés restaient encore fermé


Copyright Radio Okapi
Voir les 0 commentaires - Communauté : Afrique des Grands Lacs - Ecrire un commentaire
Par Editions Sources du Nil - Publié dans : Actualités
Mercredi 28 octobre 2009 3 28 /10 /Oct /2009 13:51
- Ecrire un commentaire
Mais pour quel salaire? Pendant que les citoyens rwandais crèvent de faim, les autorités rwandaises distribuent de grosses sommes d'argent à des personalités mondiales nanties! Comment les autorités rwandaises peuvent-elles penser  enrôler un bon entraîneur anglais pour une équipe nationale rwandaise quasiment inexistante (sans palmarès) au niveau africain? Combien vont-ils le payer, combien vont-ils payer les joueurs? Combien touchait l'ex-entraîneur des Amavubi, le Croate Branko Tucak pour des résultats quasiment nuls! Dans le même ordre d'idées, je me posais dans un autre article, combien touchent les conseillers de  luxe (Américains ou Anglais dont l'ex-Premier Ministre britannique Tony Blair) de Kagame, car personne ne pourra me convaincre qu'ils sont là pour conseiller gratuitement un dictateur aux mains ensanglantés par divers crimes contre l'humanité, les massacres et autres génocides des peuples de l'Afrique Centrale et qui jusqu'à présent n'a pas réussi à arrêter ses forfaits! Combien a-t-on payé Didier Drogba et samuel Eto'o pour un match de gala pour la campagne électorale de Kagame, car personne, là-non plus, ne pourra me convaincre qu'ils sont venus pour un match de charité!

27 oct. 2009 - Par Sam Couratin
Source: maxifoot

Viré début octobre par le club de League One anglaise de Tranmere après moins de 5 mois passés aux commandes de l'équipe première (9 défaites en 11 rencontres), l'ancien milieu international anglais John Barnes (45 ans) cherche à reprendre du service à la tête d'une sélection nationale. L'ancien coach du Celtic Glasgow avait mené la Jamaïque vers un sacre en Coupe des Caraïbes en début d'année. Barnes vient de postuler auprès de la fédération de football rwandaise dans l'espoir de devenir le nouveau sélectionneur de l'équipe nationale d'un des plus pauvres pays d'Afrique. Joseph Habineza, le ministre des sports rwandais, a confirmé la probabilité de l'embauche de Barnes dans la presse de son pays.


source: football-england.com

Few players have made as big an impact on English football as John Barnes. His career was full of exciting highs but still managed to fuel a never ending debate about the extent of his ability. If it wasn't his talent that people wanted to question then it was his attitude. And as the highest profile black footballer ever to grace the English game he has obviously been a significant individual in exposing racist attitudes and, hopefully, in going some way towards eradicating them.

John Barnes did not even arrive in England until he was fifteen when he moved with his family from Jamaica to Watford. In best comic book traditions the youngster was spotted playing on a local park, taken on by the local non-league side, Sudbury Court, which then brought him to the attention of Watford themselves.

Watford had been making big strides under the flambuoyant chairman Elton John and the astute manager Graham Taylor and had climbed from the fourth division to the second in successive seasons. Having managed to establish themselves at that level the arrival of John Barnes was a major factor in the club being able to push on even further. It was the kind of wonderful good fortune that every manager dreams of.

There were obviously some rough edges to Watford's new diamond but despite not being the finished article Barnes clearly possessed gifts that marked him out as special.

The first thing that was noticable about John Barnes was his imposing physique. Tall, broad shouldered and with tree trunk thighs he looked every inch the sort of fearsome centre half that is such a staple of our game.

He might have looked a stereotype but nothing could have been further from the truth. His impressive physical presence did make him a fearsome opponent, only not as a destroyer. Barnes was a creator and a finisher and his power combined with pace, perfect ball control and natural dribbling ability made him at times impossible to stop.

John Barnes was ready made for the Watford first team and made his debut coming on as a substitute for Malcolm Poskett against Oldham Athletic early on in the 1981-82 season. He made an immediate impression and was given his first start the following week away at Chelsea. Watford won 3-1 and there was no looking back.

Barnes flourished as Watford enjoyed their best ever season. He scored 13 league goals as the Hornets clinched promotion as runners up behind Luton Town and also featured as the club knocked both Manchester United and West Ham United out of the FA Cup. They would eventually lose out at Leicester City in the 5th round, the same stage they reached in the League Cup.


The step up to the First Division proved to be to the liking of both John Barnes and Watford. The Hornets staggered everybody by finishing 2nd in 1983 and Barnes, still in his teens, was an ever present hitting ten goals.

His remarkable mixture of raw power and ball artistry was enough to trouble the countries finest defenders and his goalscoring record proved him a more than capable finisher. This was all natural talent as well. Barnes was not the product of coaching or any youth system, he was just a young man with special gifts expressing himself on the football field.

He was expressing himself to such effect that he was handed his England debut at the end of that season, coming on as a substitute for his club colleague Luther Blissett in a goalless draw in Northern Ireland. This was to be the start of a bittersweet association with the national team.

It was the following season that really confirmed John Barnes as an important talent. Many exciting youngsters burst onto the scene in a burst of glory only to quickly fade into the background but Barnes again reached double figures for league goals as well as dazzling as Watford made it all the way to the FA Cup final. This guy was here to stay.

Predominantly a winger Barnes could be used infield to good advantage and he was capable of destroying defences on his own. Many of his goals were spectacular shots or stunning individual efforts.

When Watford travelled to Birmingham City in the quarter finals of the cup Barnes showed his mettle. It was the biggest game of his career so far and he produced his finest display yet. In a rampant performance he scored twice as Watford won 3-1, one of his goals being a tremendous solo effort. Striding away from two challengers as though they just interested onlookers Barnes sent a wicked, curving shot soaring into the top corner.

He was not able to match this performance in the final as a fine Everton team proved much too strong for Watford and ran out 2-0 winners. His defining moment was not far away, however.

John Barnes had won a handful of England caps but he had stepped into a side in transition that was struggling under Bobby Robson.

In the summer of 1984, having failed to qualify for the European Championships, England embarked on a tour of South America. The squad was patched together following a spate of withdrawals and there was very little confidence about the prospects of the inexperienced party.

Robson himself was under huge pressure and had decided on a bold gamble. With his own future possibly at stake he was going to play both Barnes and Mark Chamberlain as wingers and gamble on a two man midfield in Brazil, Uruguay and Chile.

This selection, in fact the whole trip, was rendered a glorious success by one piece of action just before half time in the opening game.

With England holding their own against Brazil in the Maracana and the game goalless Barnes received possession on the left wing just over the halfway line.

An opponent challenged immediately but Barnes stepped inside and set off towards goal. On and on he went, diagonally towards the penalty area. A series of defenders came to meet him but Barnes ignored them all. Finally, having sidestepped the keeper, there were no more challengers to beat and Barnes rolled the ball into an empty net.

It was a truly magnificent goal and left everyone stunned. Barnes would also produce the perfect centre from which Mark Hateley would clinch England's 2-0 win but it was the first goal that had everybody talking. The goal had already ensured Barnes his place in football history but it had also created a millstone that he would carry around his neck for the rest of his international career.

Whenever he appeared in future people were waiting for a repeat of this goal. The expectations created were never quite lived up to.

Although England went on to lose in Uruguay and then draw a grim game in Chile without scoring another goal the victory in Brazil ensured that the tour was regarded as a success and John Barnes was suddenly the most talked about footballer in England.

It is surprising that he remained at Watford for another three seasons from this point and that perhaps provides an early indication of the suspicion his talents aroused. It is unimaginable today that the big boys would wait so long to come calling for someone who had already produced as much magic as Barnes.

Those three seasons saw a stalling in John Barnes' development as a footballer. The brilliance was still there for all to see on a regular basis but there was more to come out than could emerge at a club that had gone as far as it possibly could.

It was obviously great for the Watford fans to be treated to such quality for a prolonged spell and Barnes did not disappoint the Vicarage Road faithful. He scored over 30 league goals during this time and helped the club to another FA Cup semi final in 1987. He scored one of the goals in a 3-1 win at Arsenal in the quarter finals but Tottenham Hotspur outclassed them in the last four to claim a place at Wembley.

His international career was also slightly in limbo and although Barnes made the squad for the 1986 World Cup finals in Mexico he had slipped from the forefront of Bobby Robson's thoughts.

Despite England enduring a turbulent campaign John Barnes did not feature until the quarter finals when they found themselves 2-0 down to a Diego Maradona inspired Argentina. He had fifteen minutes to create an impression.

Barnes transformed the game with a series of bewitching dribbles down the left. Suddenly a side that had barely created a half chance was running amok. From one jinking dribble Barnes centred for Gary Lineker to head England back into contention and then he produced a carbon copy which seemed certain to bring an equaliser only for a defender to execute an astonishing clearance from right underneath the crossbar.

It was a reminder of Barnes' qualities, unique in the English game, but still there was scepticism over the consistency of his merits.

Although people within the game were proving peculiarly hard to convince John Barnes was simply too big a talent to remain at Watford forever and he eventually moved from Vicarage Road in the summer of 1987.


Legend has it that there was an impromptu poll taken within the Liverpool dressing room to ascertain which players had caused them the most trouble during the previous season. The names that topped the list were John Barnes, Peter Beardsley and Ray Houghton. Kenny Dalglish went out and signed all three of them.
It was fantastic business.

Barnes, who had made his mark by scoring a typical solo goal against the Reds the previous season, cost the Anfield club £900,000. This was to prove a real bargain.

The new signings helped Liverpool to re-establish themselves as the countries top side. In fact many would argue that this side now became Liverpool's best ever.

Liverpool began the season in magnificent fashion, not just winning games but winning them in style. Much of their football was breathtaking and Barnes was at the forefront, settling instantly to produce a series of awesome displays which made a mockery of his critics and possibly surprised even his staunchest admirers.

Liverpool won their opening game of the season away at Arsenal and just kept on winning. Barnes scored his first goal for the club in a 2-0 win over Oxford United at Anfield as the Reds set a frightening pace.

Queens Park Rangers were one of the sides keeping closest tabs on them but when they visited Anfield in mid October they were taken apart 4-0. It was Barnes' best display yet in a Liverpool shirt and included another virtuoso solo goal, carving through the Rangers defence from halfway to finish with an exquisite curled shot into the wall of the net in front of a heaving Kop.

This was the fifth time in the opening nine games that Liverpool had scored four and also the fourth game in succession. There is no way of knowing whether John Barnes arrived at Anfield feeling he had something to prove but if he had it was already proven. He was already a hero with the Kop and while comparisons were being drawn between himself and the 60's legend Peter Thompson these scarcely seemed to do him justice. Fine player as Thompson was he had never electrified Anfield in the manner that Barnes was doing.

The season ended with Liverpool romping to the league title and John Barnes being chosen as both the Football Writers and the PFA's Player of the Year. Typically, however, there was still room for disappointments and further questioning of his ability at the top level.

Liverpool missed out on the double after a shock cup final defeat to Wimbledon and Barnes, along with the rest of the England squad, endured a miserable European Championships. Barnes did little of note as England lost all three of their group games to crash out in spectacular style.

Barnes got his hands on an FA Cup winners medal the following year after playing his part in the 3-2 victory over Everton but he missed out on the league when Michael Thomas famously snatched the title for Arsenal with his last minute goal at Anfield.

The debate about his international pedigree would never go away, raging right up to the award of his 79th and final cap against Columbia in 1995, by which time he had chipped in with 11 goals.

It is true that the consistent brilliance he showed for Liverpool always eluded him in an England Shirt but for everybody who thought the problem lay with him there was as many again who felt it was the inadequacy of his teammates. Then there were as many more who thought the managers were to blame. The argument has never been conclusively resolved.

John Barnes was certainly never blessed with much luck at international level and that doesn't help. He enjoyed another magnificent season with Liverpool in 1989-90, top scoring in the league with 22 goals as the club won another league title. This saw him again being named the Football Writers Footballer of the Year.

Yet as England embarked on a wonderful World Cup adventure, Barnes found himself hampered by a groin strain and made little impression. Even then he should have made his mark but when he did score a fine goal in the 2nd round game against Belgium he saw the effort incorrectly ruled out for offside and David Platt went on to be the hero.

England fell just short of actually winning that tournament and it is not fanciful to think that a fully fit John Barnes might well have made that difference. As it was his most notable contribution to the campaign was his rap on the World In Motion song.

Later on, when criticism of his selection was at its fiercest, Barnes put England ahead in a crucial World Cup qualifier against Holland with a beautiful free kick, curled at pace into the top corner.

England were flying and cruised into a two goal lead before an injury to Paul Gascoigne turned the tide and defensive lapses saw the Dutch escape with a draw. Barnes' early goal was almost forgotten by the end.

As Barnes moved into his thirties a series of niggling injuries led to him missing significant chunks of three successive seasons.

When he finally shrugged off these problems he was no longer the force he had been. His pace was no longer searing, especially his change of pace, and he could no longer leave his defender for dead once he had beaten him. Perhaps as importantly, however, Liverpool were no longer the team they had been before the injuries began to plague him.

Most of the old guard had disappeared and although there was a promising crop of youngsters coming through the quality of the clubs' signings had declined alarmingly.

There were question marks over John Barnes' future but he declared his intention to stay and help the youngsters make the transition into first team regulars.

The flying winger now became a scheming midfield player or a deep lying forward. His influence was still tangible but nowhere near as profound as in his prime. Basically he was now coaxing others in the hope that they could do the damage instead of just doing it himself.

He helped Liverpool win the 1995 League Cup but it was Steve McManaman who was the match winner and it was clear that a changing of the guard was in progress.

Although John Barnes soldiered on for another four seasons there were only disappointments left at the end of a glorious career.

He was in the Liverpool side that lost to Manchester United in the 1996 FA Cup final and was still there the following season as they went out of the Cup Winners Cup to Paris St Germain at the semi final stage.

In August 1997 Barnes finally left Anfield to rejoin Kenny Dalglish who had just taken over at Newcastle. The fact that John Barnes ended the season as joint top scorer in the league with six goals shows how Newcastle laboured without the mainly injured Alan Shearer.

Shearer was back as Newcastle reached the FA Cup final, however, and Barnes was the man to suffer, remaining on the bench for all but five minutes of the game as Arsenal cantered to a 2-0 win. Looking back it is difficult to agree with the selection of Temuri Ketsbaia in his place, even if Barnes was pushing 35.

The next season would be the last for Barnes and he ended it with Charlton Athletic as they suffered relegation from the Premier League.

It almost seems unfair to comment on the latter stages of Barnes' career when the early part was such a glorious trip of exhilarating football and success.

It is interesting to consider the end of his career in light of the criticism he received throughout his playing days suggesting that he lacked real passion or drive, however.

If that had been the case then why did Barnes bother carrying on playing for so long? It would have been all too easy for him to walk away from the game when things became harder for him because of the injuries he began to suffer, especially as the players around him were patently not of the quality to which he had become accustomed in his earlier days. He certainly did not need the money.

The fact that Barnes chose to carry on playing so long in an attempt to nurture a new, great Liverpool side seems to show a commitment to the club and a simple desire to play football. It is natural that extravagantly gifted players love playing football but not all of them retain that desire when their powers begin to fade. John Barnes was one of those who did.

His willingness to endure widespread and continual criticism as an England player also suggests a man brimming with ambition and personal pride.

The abuse was always personal and although it generally centred on his performances this was not always the case. His international career began when there was a definite hooligan element among England's support. There was also a definite racist element.

Famously a group of travelling supporters were heard remarking, after Barnes had scored his wonderful goal in Brazil, that England had only won 1-0 because his goal didn't count. They might as well have called it a goalless draw as he had also set the other goal up but that didn't apparently occur to them.

John Barnes also had to endure plenty of abuse during domestic games and the photo of him casually backheeling a banana from the pitch remains one of the most powerful images from the time.

This all brings us back to the question that if he was really not that bothered then why did he put up with such rubbish for so long?

In one respect John Barnes had to play football simply because that is what he was born to do. By playing on through the tougher times when he could have rested on his considerable laurels shows him to be a man of ambition and desire.

As for putting up with the abuse that came his way there was always a thoughtful dignity in Barnes on and off the pitch that suggested he realised full well just how his behaviour and standing put into a telling context that of those aiming the abuse.

He has been an important figure as more than just a wonderful footballer.

Voir les 0 commentaires - Communauté : Afrique des Grands Lacs - Ecrire un commentaire
Par Editions Sources du Nil - Publié dans : Actualités
Mardi 3 novembre 2009 2 03 /11 /Nov /2009 08:32
- Ecrire un commentaire

Le groupe Yakutumba décide de se retirer du processus d’intégration des Forces armées de la République Démocratique du Congo (FARDC) après les combats qui l'ont opposé lundi, à Baraka, au Sud-Kivu, aux militaires de la 12e brigade intégrée de l’armée régulière. Ces combats ont fait des victimes de part et d’autre, rapporte radiookapi.net

Le bilan, encore provioire, fait état d’au moins 7 morts, 5 du côté du groupe Yakutumba, et 2 dans les rangs des FARDC. Il y a eu également plusieus blessés dont un policier et une femme atteints par des balles perdues, et un enfant renversé par un véhicule. A ce jour, selon le commandant FARDC à Baraka, les Mai-Mai du groupe Yakutumba, en débandade, seraient en fuite vers le sud de ce territoire. Leur chef, Yakutumba, se serait également évaporé. Depuis lundi après-midi, il serait injoignable, précise la même source.


Pour cet ex-mouvement politico militaire (Yakutumba), l’incident à la base des combats serait attribué aux FARDC. Des soldats de la 12e brigade auraient été les premiers à tirer en direction des ex-combattants du groupe. Cet incident et les combats qui s'en sont suivis poussent ainsi les Mai-Mai Yakutumba à renoncer au processus d'intégration. Mais, du côté des FARDC, le commandement de 12e brigade accuse à son tour les éléments du groupe Yakutumba de commettre des actes rebelles et d’avoir mis en place une organisation parallèle.


Jusque ce mardi matin, la situation, bien que redevenue calme depuis lundi, après les affontments, la circulation n’avait pas encore repris à Baraka. Des pillages ont été signalés dans deux quartiers de la place, non loin de la piste d'aviation, attribués aux hommes en uniforme. Ce qui justifie la frayeur parmi les populations civiles
Copyright Radio Okapi
Voir les 1 commentaires - Communauté : Afrique des Grands Lacs - Ecrire un commentaire
Par Editions Sources du Nil - Publié dans : Actualités

Recherche

Présentation

Syndication

  • Flux RSS des articles
Créer un blog gratuit sur over-blog.com - Contact - C.G.U. - Rémunération en droits d'auteur - Signaler un abus - Articles les plus commentés